Polishing inner wall of crossed deep micropores using magnetic microabrasive jet technology
-
摘要: 针对交叉深孔内壁常规光整加工尺寸受限、加工不均匀、质量差等问题，结合磨料射流去除函数稳定、自适应性强等特点，用磁性微磨料射流技术对交叉深孔内壁进行光整加工以提高其质量。通过动态磁场下的磁性微磨料聚焦技术，采用有限元法和离散元法耦合对不同参数下的磁性微磨料射流抛光交叉深孔内壁过程进行模拟，分析不同参数下的流场分布、侵蚀速率、壁面剪切力作用规律。通过响应面法对射流靶距、射流压强及喷嘴直径3参数进行优化，以孔口、孔内壁面及孔交叉部分所受的壁面剪切力和侵蚀速率的综合影响为响应值，建立响应面方程，获得最佳参数组合并进行试验验证。结果表明：利用响应面法得到的最佳工艺参数组合是射流靶距为7.0 mm，射流压强为1.0 MPa，喷嘴直径为1.4 mm；在此组合参数下加工的交叉深孔内部相贯处毛刺等缺陷被有效去除，其内壁面孔附近的表面粗糙度Ra从0.49 μm降至0.13 μm，且孔口处有较好的倒圆效果。Abstract:
Objectives Precision micro through-hole parts are widely used. However, due to the limitations of manufacturing technology, precision parts with complex shapes, such as cross micro-holes, may have defects such as burrs, scratches, and nodules during the manufacturing process. In view of the problems of conventional finishing processing of cross deep micro-holes being limited by size, uneven processing, and poor quality, and combined with the characteristics of a stable removal function and strong adaptability of the abrasive jet, the magnetic micro-abrasive jet technology finishing processing method is proposed to improve the quality of the inner wall of cross deep micro-holes. Methods An independent magnetic abrasive jet device was used to carry out finishing tests on the cross deep micro-holes, and an electromagnetic device was used to generate a focusing magnetic force near the nozzle outlet. The magnetic abrasive was concentrated towards the center during the internal movement of the nozzle, alleviating the problem of rapid divergence of the magnetic abrasives with the jet after spraying and further improving the efficiency of finishing processing. A simulation mathematical model was established to explore the influence of different process parameters on the finishing effect. The finite element method and the discrete element method were coupled to simulate the polishing process of the inner wall of deep micro-holes by the magnetic micro-abrasive jet under different process parameters. The flow field distribution, the erosion rate, and the action law of wall shear force under different parameters were analyzed, and the key factors were identified. Finally, the response surface method was used to optimize the three factors of jet target distance, jet pressure, and nozzle diameter. The response surface equation was established and solved by taking the comprehensive influences of wall shear force and erosion rate on the orifice, the inner wall of the hole, and the cross part of the hole as the response value, and the optimal combination of process parameters was obtained and verified by the test. Results Adding a focusing magnetic field near the nozzle can effectively reduce the divergence of the abrasive after jet ejection, and further improve the efficiency and quality of magnetic abrasive ejection polishing of cross deep micro-holes. The simulation results show that the main parameters affecting micro-hole finishing are jet target distance, jet pressure, and nozzle diameter. By using the response surface method combined with experiments for parameter optimization, the optimal process parameter combination for magnetic micro-abrasive jet finishing of cross deep micro-hole inner walls is obtained, which includes a jet target distance of 7 mm, a jet pressure of 1.0 MPa, and a nozzle diameter of 1.4 mm. Under the optimal combination of process parameters, the inner wall quality of the cross deep micro-holes is significantly improved, the burrs at the cross-holes are completely removed, the wall roughness Ra is reduced from 0.49 μm to 0.13 μm, and the orifice has a good rounding effect. Conclusions By combining magnetic fields and abrasive jets, the magnetic micro-abrasive jet technology provides a new method for the finishing of cross deep micro-holes. Due to the ability of the magnetic abrasive micro-jet to achieve focused fixed-point machining, it has significant processing advantages in cross deep micro-hole finishing and deburring. By constructing a physical model of the machining process and using the simulation form of coupling the finite element method and the discrete element method, it is possible to more clearly simulate the motion of the abrasive and flow field in the abrasive water jet during the machining process, as well as the force situation of the workpiece being machined. In the finishing process of cross-hole parts, the nozzle diameter, pressure, and target distance have a direct impact on the finishing effect. However, parameter adjustment is required for finishing workpieces of different sizes and shapes. Finding suitable processing parameters will further improve the quality and efficiency of workpiece processing. -
图 5 磨料颗粒与流体的速度变化曲线
Figure 5. Velocity variation curves between abrasive particles and fluid
图 15 射流在空气中的速度变化云图及发散情况
Figure 15. Velocity change nephogram and divergence of jet in air
图 19 靶距和喷嘴直径的交互影响
Figure 19. Interactive effect of target distance and nozzle diameter
图 20 加工前后工件表面形貌及表面粗糙度
Figure 20. Surface morphology and surface roughness of workpiece before and after processing
表 1 研磨介质成分及参数
Table 1. Composition and parameters of grinding medium
成分 基本颗粒尺寸 D1 / $ \mathrm{\mu }\mathrm{m} $ 质量分数 ω / % α-Al2O3磁性磨料 50 5.0 悬浮剂 0.1 分散剂 0.3 纯净水 余量 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同射流压强下射流的最大速度和质量流率
Table 2. Maximum velocity and mass flow rate of jet under different jet pressures
压强 p' / MPa 射流最大速度 vmax / (m·s−1) 质量流率 M / (kg·s−1) 0.1 14.3 0.0205 0.4 29.0 0.0413 0.7 38.6 0.0548 1.0 46.2 0.0656 1.3 52.8 0.0749
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 试验设计的因素及水平
Table 3. Factors and levels of experimental design
水平 因素 射流靶距 d / mm
A射流压强 p' / MPa
B喷嘴直径 D2 / mm
C−1 4.0 0.8 0.8 0 7.0 1.0 1.4 1 10.0 1.2 2.0
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 响应面法计算结果
Table 4. Response surface method calculation results
因素 平方和 SS 自由度 df 均方值 MS F值 P值 模型 2.28 × 105 9 2.53 × 105 801.04 < 0.0001 A 2.73 × 105 1 2.73 × 105 861.83 < 0.0001 B 1.48 × 105 1 1.48 × 105 469.72 < 0.0001 C 2.04 × 105 1 2.04 × 105 644.33 < 0.0001 AB 716.71 1 716.71 2.26 0.1762 AC 6531.30 1 6531.30 20.62 0.0027 BC 13239.02 1 13239.02 41.80 0.0003 A2 1.28 × 105 1 1.28 × 105 406.57 < 0.0001 B2 6.46 × 105 1 6.46 × 105 2039.36 < 0.0001 C2 7.11 × 105 1 7.11 × 105 2247.39 < 0.0001 残差 2217.29 7 316.76 失拟量 2217.29 3 739.10 误差 0.00 4 0.01 总和 2.28 × 106 16
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 冯绮雯, 吴戈, 陆燕华, 等. 航天电液伺服机构多余物控制研究 [J]. 质量与可靠性,2023(2):8-13.FENG Qiwen, WU Ge, LU Yanhua, et al. Research on excess control of aerospace electro-hydraulic servo mechanism [J]. Quality and Reliability,2023(2):8-13. [2] 陈国文, 王德新, 金秀杰. 电加工技术在航空发动机制造中的应用 [J]. 金属加工(冷加工),2010(16):25-26.CHEN Guowen, WANG Dexin, JIN Xiujie. Application of electrical machining technology in aircraft engine manufacturing [J]. Metal Processing (Cold Working),2010(16):25-26. [3] 姜俊, 舒鑫, 雍建华, 等. 金属切削毛刺形成与控制技术研究进展 [J]. 工具技术,2021,55(7):3-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7008.2021.07.001JIANG Jun, SHU Xin, YONG Jianhua, et al. Research progress of metal cutting burr formation and control technology [J]. Tool Technology,2021,55(7):3-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7008.2021.07.001 [4] 周悦, 王雨婷, 伊福廷, 等. 基于磁流变技术的微孔内壁抛光装置研制及性能研究 [J]. 表面技术,2018,47(6):252-257. doi: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2018.06.036ZHOU Yue, WANG Yuting, YI Futing, et al. Development and performance study of microporous inner wall polishing device based on magnetorheological technology [J]. Surface Technology,2018,47(6):252-257. doi: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2018.06.036 [5] 石沛. 钛合金管内壁珩磨式磁流变抛光方法及机理研究 [D]. 沈阳: 东北大学, 2019.SHI Pei. Study on honing magnetorheological polishing method and mechanism of inner wall of titanium alloy tube [D]. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2019. [6] FURUMOTOT, UEDA T, AMINO T, et al. A study of internal face finishing of the cooling channel in injection mold with free abrasive grains [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2011,211(11):1742-1748. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.05.018 [7] WANG H Q, WEI H Q, PENG C, et al. Application of abrasive flow machining in removing surface defect in metal parts of 3D printing: The 20th International Symposium on Advances in Abrasive Technology(ISAAT-2017) [C]. Okinawa: Manufa-Cturing Automation, 2017. [8] 朱慧宁, 马小刚, 程海东, 等. 磁针磁力研磨工艺对发动机涡轮叶片表面质量的试验研究 [J]. 航空制造术,2021,64(18):62-68. doi: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2021.18.062ZHU Huining, MA Xiaogang, CHENG Haidong, et al. Experimental study on surface quality of engine turbine blades by magnetic needle magnetic grinding process [J]. Aeronautical Manufacturing,2021,64(18):62-68. doi: 10.16080/j.issn1671-833x.2021.18.062 [9] 邓乾发, 汪杨笑, 吕冰海, 等. 自激脉冲特性磨料水射流浸没式抛光数值分析与有效性实验验证 [J]. 表面技术,2022,51(1):161-173. doi: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2022.01.017DENG Qianfa, WANG Yangxiao, LV Binghai, et al. Numerical analysis and effectiveness verification of self-excited pulse characteristics abrasive waterjet immersion polishing [J]. Surface Technology,2022,51(1):161-173. doi: 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2022.01.017 [10] 林琳, 何周伟, 胡涛, 等. 磨料水射流抛光技术进展综述 [J]. 液压与气动,2022,46(1):74-91. doi: 10.11832/j.issn.1000-4858.2022.01.010LIN Lin, HE Zhouwei, HU Tao, et al. Review of progress of abrasive waterjet polishing technology [J]. Hydraulics & Pneumatics,2022,46(1):74-91. doi: 10.11832/j.issn.1000-4858.2022.01.010 [11] 王中昱, 张连新, 孙鹏飞, 等. 磨料水射流抛光技术综述 [J]. 电加工与模具,2019(1):70-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-279X.2019.z1.014WANG Zhongyu, ZHANG Lianxin, SUN Pengfei, et al. Review of abrasive waterjet polishing technology [J]. Electrical Processing and Mold,2019(1):70-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-279X.2019.z1.014 [12] 王志阳, 王凯. 基于FLUENT的磨料水射流抛光喷嘴的流场仿真 [J]. 中国设备工程,2017(9):101-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0711.2017.09.053WANG Zhiyang, WANG Kai. Flow field simulation of abrasive waterjet polishing nozzle based on FLUENT [J]. China Equipment Engineering,2017(9):101-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0711.2017.09.053 [13] 刘超, 刘聪. 前混合磨料水射流技术在煤矿井下的应用前景分析 [J]. 煤矿机械,2016,37(8):3-6. doi: 10.13436/j.mkjx.201608002LIU Chao, LIU Cong. Application prospect analysis of pre-mixed abrasive water jet technology in coal mine downground [J]. Coal Mining Machinery,2016,37(8):3-6. doi: 10.13436/j.mkjx.201608002 [14] 陈逢军, 尹业青, 胡天. 仿形喷嘴磨料射流抛光微结构仿真及试验研究 [J]. 机械工程学报,2022,58(15):177-187. doi: 10.3901/JME.2022.15.177CHEN Fengjun, YIN Yeqing, HU Tian, et al. Simulation and experimental study on microstructure of abrasive jet polishing of profiling nozzles [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering,2022,58(15):177-187. doi: 10.3901/JME.2022.15.177 [15] 花煜昌. 前混合磨料水射流切割45号钢的切深理论与试验研究 [D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2021.HUA Yuchang. Theoretical and experimental study on depth of cut of No. 45 steel by water jet cutting of premixed abrasives [D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2021. [16] 司鹄, 谢延明, 杨春和, 等. 磨料水射流作用下岩石损伤场的数值模拟 [J]. 岩土力学,2011,32(3):935-940. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.03.048SI Hu, XIE Yanming, YANG Chunhe, et al. Numerical simulation of rock damage field under abrasive water jet [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2011,32(3):935-940. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2011.03.048 [17] NQUVEN T, SHANMUGAM D K, WANG J. Effect of liquid properties on the stability of an abrasive waterjet [J]. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture,2008(48):1138-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2008.01.009 [18] LIU H, WANG A J, KELSON N, et al. A study of abrasive water jet characteristics by CFD simulation [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology,2004(153/154):488-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.037 [19] 张文超, 武美萍. 磨料水射流抛光45钢工艺参数优化 [J]. 机械设计与研究,2017,33(6):113-117. doi: 10.13952/j.cnki.jofmdr.2017.0254ZHANG Wenchao, WU Meiping. Optimization of process parameters of abrasive waterjet polishing 45 steel [J]. Mechanical Design and Research,2017,33(6):113-117. doi: 10.13952/j.cnki.jofmdr.2017.0254 [20] 林晓东, 卢义玉, 汤积仁, 等. 前混合式磨料水射流磨料粒子加速过程数值模拟 [J]. 振动与冲击,2015,34(16):19-24. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2015.16.004LIN Xiaodong, LU Yiyu, TANG Jiren, et al. Numerical simulation of abrasive particle acceleration process of pre-hybrid abrasive waterjet [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock,2015,34(16):19-24. doi: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2015.16.004 [21] 周新超, 马小晶, 廖翔云, 等. 磨料水射流冲击孔隙岩体的SPH模拟研究 [J]. 岩土工程学报,2022,44(4):731-739. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202204016ZHOU Xinchao, MA Xiaojing, LIAO Xiangyun, et al. SPH simulation study on impact of abrasive water jet on pore rock mass [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2022,44(4):731-739. doi: 10.11779/CJGE202204016 [22] 李福来, 荆正军, 马少华, 等. 磨料水射流加工材料去除机制及影响因素分析 [J]. 山东化工,2021,50(2):129-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-021X.2021.02.046LI Fulai, JING Zhengjun, MA Shaohua, et al. Analysis of removal mechanism and influencing factors of abrasive water jet processing materials [J]. Shandong Chemical Industry,2021,50(2):129-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-021X.2021.02.046 [23] 何雪明, 陈泽华, 武美萍, 等. 基于磨料水射流的螺杆转子加工新方法研究 [J]. 中国机械工程,2016,27(19):2581-2588. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2016.19.005HE Xueming, CHEN Zehua, WU Meiping, et al. Research on new method of screw rotor processing based on abrasive water jet [J]. China Mechanical Engineering,2016,27(19):2581-2588. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2016.19.005 [24] 卞达, 宋恩敏, 倪自丰, 等. 基于响应面法的单晶硅CMP抛光工艺参数优化 [J]. 金刚石与磨料磨具工程,2022,42(6):745-752. doi: 10.13394/j.cnki.jgszz.2022.0081BIAN Da, SONG Enmin, NI Zifeng, et al. Optimization of process parameters of single crystal silicon CMP polishing process based on response surface method [J]. Diamond & Abrasives Engineering,2022,42(6):745-752. doi: 10.13394/j.cnki.jgszz.2022.0081 [25] MA X, WEN C. Optimization analysis of mechanical performance of copper stave with special-shaped tubes in the blast furnace bosh [J]. ISIJ International,2021,61(1):55-61. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2019-799 -
点击查看大图
图(20) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 50
- HTML全文浏览量: 34
- PDF下载量: 9
- 被引次数: 0
邮件订阅
RSS
